Shouldn't it be ~6500K as specified in the PME hardware calibration?ĭispla圜al also has a menu item 'Tools->Report->Report on calibrated display device'.
#Change icc name displaycal verification#
The verification report has a measured whitepoint of 6697K. This is where I have the most discrepancies since I began testing. What is more concerning is the White Point Level. The Profile Information (not shown) indicates 96.2% gamut coverage for Adobe RGB. To avoid any confusion, here are my Displa圜al settings to generate the profile:ĭispla圜al "Display& instrument" settingsĪ portion of the generated Profile report is below:ĭispla圜al measurement report PME calibration/Displa圜al profile Just use Displa圜al in "Profile only" mode to measure the calibration. I agree that Displa圜al is a better way to create profiles, but no need to use it to calibrate if you've created hardware 3D LUTs with Pallete Master. However, it's the only way to generate hardware (monitor-internal) calibration.
I agree that Palette Master is rather manky. I then used Displa圜al to generate a profile as described by "Simon" in this posting: Palette Master Element Validation Report - Adobe RGB, White Level 110, White Point 6500K I will use an Adobe RGB calibration generated today to illustrate the discrepancies between PME and Displa圜al. I just wanted to be clear in how I did my testing/verification. Sorry for the large number of attached images. I would just like to be assured in some way that the calibration generated by PME is accurate, other than relying on the PME verification alone.
#Change icc name displaycal software#
Upon receiving it I installed the Palette Master Element (PME) software version 1.3.9. I recently (June 8) purchased a BenQ SW270C display. I'm not well versed at all in color profiling and could use any help in interpreting my attempts to verify the accuracy of my BenQ SW270C display calibration.
0 kommentar(er)
